Duty of ‘Bharat is to Enjoy Shining & Spread Shining’ (13)

This entry was posted on Thursday, February 4th, 2021 and is filed under ECONOMIC, ECONOMY, RELIGIOUS, SOCIAL.

{Duty of ‘Bharat is to Enjoy Shining & Spread Shining’ (12) could not be published due to code related problems}

Developed nations mostly like India. Indian ports are better situated for the global business compared to China. Then why India is not developing? —

— Unnecessary agitations, bandh and violence during the agitation is another reason. Indian law is good against any kind of crime but some time fails against the mass violence. In India, law & order is a state subject. Union Government cannot intervene in the state matters.

When mob destroyed more than a thousand mobile towers in support of an agitation which is known as the ‘farmers agitation’, leaders of the agitation showed only a lip sympathy. — Is it not a war against India?

If a group tries to destroy the ‘Republic Day’ celebration of the country, is it not Anti-National?

‘Farmers Protest’ is the media given name of the agitation. But the protest is against the ‘Freedom of Poor Farmers’. Is it humanitarian?

— “IF ANOTHER COUNTRY CROSSES THE BORDER OR DESTROYS OUR ASSETS, IT IS NOTHING BUT WAR. BUT IF A VIOLENT MOB DESTROYS NATIONAL ASSETS OR ‘SHRI OF THE NATION’; IS IT NOT A WAR?”

— “PRESIDENT SHOULD APPOINT AN AUTONOMOUS LIKE BODY WHICH CAN IMMEDIATELY ACT EVEN WITHOUT WAITING FOR THE STATE GOVERNMENT PERMISSION OR INVITATION. THE DUTY OF THE BODY SHOULD BEGIN WHENEVER SUCH MOB VIOLENCE ERUPTS IN ANY REGION OR PART OF THE COUNTRY. THIS AUTONOMOUS BODY SHOULD WORK ONLY UNDER THE PRESIDENT AND SHOULD BE ABOVE THE JURISDICTION OF THE LAW ENFORCING AUTHORITIES OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT. THIS AUTONOMOUS LIKE BODY SHOULD HAVE ADDITIONAL RIGHTS TO TAKE STRINGENT ACTIONS AGAINST THE PERSONS INDULGED IN THE MOB VIOLENCE AND ALSO AGAINST HIDDEN LEADERS. SUCH LEADERS ARE MORE HARMFUL THAN SMUGGLERS AS THEY USE THEIR FAMILY ASSETS FOR THE WAR LIKE CRIME AGAINST INDIA AND INDIAN CITIZENS. SO THEIR ASSETS & INTERESTS SHOULD BE CONFISCATED EVEN IF THEY HOLD ANY KIND OF INFLUENTIAL POSITIONS OR ASSET PORTFOLIOS IN THE COUNTRY.”

Filed Under: ECONOMIC, ECONOMY, RELIGIOUS, SOCIAL